But he doesn't and you don't. The only things that are going to matter in this fight are skill with a blade, and endurance. Lord of the Rings vs. Game of Thrones: Could Daenerys' Army Defeat Sauron's? Dunno about book Jamie but unless he can fight for a night without tiring he to gets stomped I was going by the literary version in my post. Yes thats right- he started the line of Numenoreon kings. Lord of the Rings: It's No Ring of Power, but Aragorn's Ring Is Important Too, Lord of the Rings: Why Russell Crowe Turned Down the Aragorn Role, Black Adam's Biggest Plot Holes and Unanswered Questions, Madame Web's Terminator Villain May Be Spider-Man - Sort Of, It's Time Daniel Craig's MCU Hero Gets a Second Chance, X-Men: The Last Stand's Biggest Twist Was Never Explained, Hellraiser Subverts the Game With a Key Cenobite Twist, The Path of the Open Hand May Be Star Wars' Most Dangerous Force Cult, REVIEW: Image Comics' Rogues' Gallery Vol. Giving Aragorn even more of an advantage due to the fact chainmail is just as effective against swords as platemail. Yes he has increased stamina, but that's all we know for certain. Quite useful skill, don't you think? He is also descended from a legendary race of Man -- his bloodline is evident when one considers that during the events of The Lord of the Rings, he is already over 80 years of age. Tell this to any Batman fan and he would eat you alive. We've had two such threads with the exact same characters and stipulations posted on NF before in the last two years. They don't possess great skill with a blade by any stretch of the imagination. Everything about him boils down to assumption and theory. - Page 3 Nouveau sujet Liste des sujets. If you bothered to read the OP you would realize that stealth is not a factor in this fight. Aragorn is descended from Luthien, and therefore Melian, so he does literally have an angel in his ancestry. Page suivante Fin. There are no knights. Martin writes as Malory wrote Le Morte D'Arthur More about Knights.. More about kings. It's known that Aragorn has survived battles with thousands of men and orcs, yet little is said about his one on one fights with other skilled swordsmen. ;) Aragorn can hide himself from his oponent and attack at the right moment. Book versions of both, I used the movie pictures to give them a face. However, at the end of the day, Aragorn's naturalNmenorean physique trumps all other advantages. Aragorn vs Jaime Lannister. Goblins and Orcs didn't have any skill with a blade, they only relied on numbers and raw strength. cesaretli de birisi. I would agree, but recently I read an extensive post on Reddit. That was against a woman. Jaime is a foe who has extensively studied the blade and is said by many characters to be extremely skilled. It's also why the match-up is so heated becauseit's difficult to find aclear victor. I have never seen a poll as wrong as this. Tranquil Fury The Only Thing I know May 18, 2014 #16 Bender said: Also Aragorn is slightly Numenorean IIRC If you want, I'll PM you the rants in question. It's mentioned at least twice in the books, but I guess that is nitpicking too, huh? For The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt on the PlayStation 4, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Aragorn and Jaime Lannister vs Geralt" - Page 6. Especially within his favourite franchises, such as Star Wars. Aragorn with his Sword, Gimli with his Axe & Legolas with his two swords. Three, days running (tracking the uruk hai), I think all three of them did that didn't, they? This is my opinion of how it plays out: Aragorn II Elessar at 87 is crowned King of Arnor and Gondor, he decides to conquer the Seven Kingdoms and bring order, he bids his wife goodbye and goes. well, we can at least discuss it. His entire life was full of conflict and victories, and so he undoubtedly has the skill to stand againstJaime Lannister. Aragorn vs. Jaime Lannister: Who Is the Greater Fantasy Swordsman? Even before Jaime lost his hand, he's 40, a regular human, with a normal steel sword and wasn't trained by anyone special, just relies on his, admittedly impressive, natural talent. Aragorn=King. Had the events that would mark him as The Kingslayer not occurred, he may have become the best fighter in all of Westeros. Jaime also managed to successfully fight Brienne of Tarth all while being bound and starving as her prisoner. Aragorn wins. It's good to wear armor if you're fighting with sharp pieces of metal.". oooooo.I think I'm going to go with Aragorn. I did not want to spoil anything for those who have not read the series, but I haven't even gone into the instances in SOFAI where, in individual duel combat (which is what we have here), the fighter in the heavier plate armor has been at a distinct disadvantage. I never How did the ultra deadly Jaqen H'ghar get captured in the What was the worst advice Tyrion gave Daenerys? Imagine Aragorn vs. a single goblin, or a single orc, or a single Urak-hai. He's like 80+ or something by the time of Fellowship. This is a place to enjoy and discuss the HBO series, book series ASOIAF, and GRRM works in general. We're not talking about Warcraft which can allow such retarded anachronisms to occur here. Does Jaime get both hands? That's interesting. Fight takes place in the forest. EDIT: Jaime gets both hands. with the help of that 3rd level illusionist, Aragorn was able to lure a whole kingdom to believe such a silly thing like that he was the heir of a thousands years lost dinasty. Choose your favorite ANIMATED LOGO for our Discord server icon, Jaime Lannister (HBO) vs Geralt of Rivia (Netflix), Jaime Lannister (GoT) vs Hadrian Blackwater (Riyria Revelations), King Arthur vs Aragorn: Arthurian legend vs Lord of the Rings, Jessica Cruz (Green Lantern) VS Jaime Reyes (Blue Beetle). Jaime can put up a respectable fight, but I can't see him winning any scenario. I'd say he's far more ruthless than Aragorn. Book Aragorn is still a numenor, so I'm pretty sure he's superhuman by our standards. top fighters of their respective franchises. All we can do is guess what kind of stats that would give him. Elros and Elrond were given a choice of which race they would live with (adopting the resulting life span and traits, etc). JavaScript is disabled. Unless i'm mistaken Aragorn took down a troll at the battle of Minas Tirith(in the books) so that shows some pretty good sword play considering the size of them. You have nothing to back your claim that kingslayer has an equipment advantage. But Brienne is not in the upper echelon of fighters. Of course GRRM will say Jaime wins, but at the end of the day Jaime is still only human. Qui putain de gagne ? No, we don't need to guess because we know that it gives him greatly increase stamina - he run for three days without rest, withouth food and water and he wasn't even tired after that. Sounds more like theory. This is spot on. I really only see Jaime having a chance in Round 3. He has a few that are really good, but Aragorn has ten times as many that are just as impressive. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Ser Selmy at one point talks of Jaime being the best natural swordsman that he's ever seen. And on the point of Anduril, hey if you're going that route, how about you quantify the properties of Sauron's hand? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwRix1p9sDY. aragorn btn thrones karakterlerinin canna sar. Not to mention the guy lived for 210 years before dying so depending on which version, the Kingslayer could be fighting a guy with more than 100 years of combat experience. Aragorn definitelyhas experience on his side,being the age of 87 duringThe Lord of the Rings. Lord Tywin Lannister believes its time for a change of 1st high King of the Reunited Kingdom. You're nitpicking because you're trying to make the works something they're not. Jaime would beat Aragorn in single combat according to George R.R Martin. These are also a worlds based in magic and mythical creatures (which our world's medieval setting did not have from the history I've read). Worse yet, Jaime is 42 years old. He shoves Frodo over the edge of the lookout. Jaime's skill paired with his armor means he could stand his ground for a long while and take a good amount of hits before going down. RELATED: Lord of the Rings vs. Game of Thrones: Could Daenerys' Army Defeat Sauron's? Supposedly Book Aragorn doesn't have superhuman physical attributes and if Jaime's wearing plate, that's another point in his favor. [SPOILERS book J] COTF have to bring a ring to the Doom of Valyria. Here's an interesting thread posted a year ago: http://www.reddit.com/r/whowouldwin/comments/1dn0rn/jaime_lannistergame_of_thones_v_aragornlotr/. This wolud be a huge factor in this fight. So, what we see is that a maimed Jaime is able to hold his own against a skilled -- but not great -- knight. Aragorn wins no less than a solid majority, but it's not easy, as they are both exceedingly talented. Anduril doesn't give Aragorn any sort of advantage. But, it would seem that his accomplishments -- not Aragorn's -- are the ones that are lacking. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Dudethis isn't even a contest. Sujet : Aragorn vs Jaime Lannister. In The Lord of the Rings, however, we see Aragorn ride into several real battles and face numerous foes and come out unscathed. What Happened to Faramir After The Lord of the Rings? Well movie/show fighting tends to be godawful, but Aragorn did impressively deflect a dagger heading straight for his face like a jedi (which ironically was entirely real, accidental, and not choreographed but depended on Vigo's reflexes saving him from Lurtz's actor's bad throw). He didn't really fight the Nazguls, he just surprised them and drove them off with fire. And what's all this talk about ASOIF having superior tech? Aragorn was one of the Rangers of the North, so he have vast knowledge about stealth, tracking and healing herbs. Aragorn has better endurance, but Jaime has better skill. Both works references steel abundantly, so excuse me if I believe they're intelligent enough to make their armors out of it. The only thing we really have to get a sense of Aragorns skill is the foes he's faced, everything else is irrelavent. Who would win in a fight Jaime Lannister vs Aragorn? They don't possess great skill with a blade by any stretch of the imagination. He has traveled the world learning new things as well. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Gandalf mentions something about him being able to lead men well but not with any help from some inner magic. Wasn't Aragorn the descendant of Elros Tar-Minyatur (Elrond's twin brother) in the book? Tolkien focuses more on the black and white struggles between good and evil. If anything, Jamie is at a disadvantage because Aragorn has Andril and Jamie nothing to match it. He's 80 something years old and still in his prime, was trained by the elves, owns a mythical uber sword, and has done nothing but fight and survive his entire life. In his spare time, Ben is usually watching movies, playing games and running D&D games for friends (and hopes to one day actually be a player). Content must be relevant. He can fight all of the Nazgul at the same time and kill dozens of Uruk-hai, all of them bigger and stronger than any soldier Jaime ever killed. Uruk-Hai are nothing special, their fighting technique consists of being strong and hacking at things with a sword. That's exactly my point, Tolkien didn't give us much of anything to gauge his skill with. There is no clear definition of how good aragorn is, while Jaime is clearly spelled out as one of the best. Jaime (Prime, both hands) vs RoTK Aragorn Who is the better swordsman - in both the book and movie versions of their respective series? And found that his passion lays in scriptwriting, where he can combine his love of movies, writing, and storytelling. As a descendant of Nmenor, an ancient and powerful race of men, Aragorn has the gift of increased strength, wisdom and life. He's making a joke about another of Viggo Mortenson's roles. Aragorn as an old man can probably man-handle peak Jamie. If any of you have read the silmarillion you'll know that there where some elf and human heros from the first age that make aragorn, and pretty much all the LOTR charcaters, look dilluted and far less powerful. All the latest gaming news, game reviews and trailers. 88 years of experience, stamina: significantly above peak human level, Rangers skills and sword mastery. Jaime Lannister Vs Aragorn Thread starter Greedy master; Start date Jun 5, 2013; Status Not open for further replies. You can't base the skills of an entire group off what you see from one guy. Considering that Ser Selmy is the Captain of the Kingsguard, that is high praise indeed. Aragorn all the way. On a early Sunday morning (2:00am) a fully armored and fully equipped Kingslayer works his way up to Aragorn's chambers with the intention of killing him. Despite most match-up discussions favoring Aragorn by a landslide, it would likely be a much closer fight than people realize. 6. dedekorkut46. it is purposedly done by Martin to make the loss of his sword hand in a later book such a crisis of character for the Kingslayer. He is one of the best swordsman in all Westeros, maybe not up to the legends like Ser Barristan Selmy but definitely on par with the likes of Sandor Clegane or Robert Baratheon. He undoubtedly has excellent precisionand control when weaving through a hoard but facing down an expert fighter with no distractions is a much different circumstance than he seems used to. The fact that Aragorn doesn't go through the books breaking other swords and shields willy nilly suggests that Anduril is not as powerful as you make it to be. White walkers are no simple human either, still one was killed by a Sam. you mean book Aragorn who ran in full armor for 3 days and nights or more without stopping or sleepingwhen the three companions covered several hundred miles? Therefore you are guessing that one armor is better because of how they resemble what our medieval equipment was like. Hence, the importance of the individual skills of the knights were more elaborated. We have three main rules. Aragorn. RELATED: Lord of the Rings: It's No Ring of Power, but Aragorn's Ring Is Important Too, However, during a fan Q&A with Game of Thrones author George R. R. Martin, an audience member askedwho he thought would win in this match-up. I pick Jaime every time. He's said to have won his first fighting tournament at the age of 13 and went on to win many more throughout his life. She defeats a few sellswords -- not a stellar accomplishment. What do they have that surpasses mithril armor, which Aragorn would probably be sporting? With the loss of his great skill, he must redefine himself completely. It's hard to calculate his swordsmanship. What a reach. You're right that much of the debate surrounding Aragorn rests on assumptions and theories. It was the fire that made them flee, not any skill on Aragorns part. Also, because you know, were are they fighting, starting distance ect. When debating this match-up, the most common argument made for Aragorn's victory is his bloodline. Previous Video - George RR Martin on People Harassing Him for Not Writing: https://youtu.be/J_UVZr6Xd6EA Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones Author George R. Thus he must have had the physical stats to keep up with an Elf who I believe were confirmed to be reasonably faster then humans. Aragorn would sweep Jamie aside if it was a straight armor for armor fight on foot, but if not he would easily sneak up and just kill him with an arrow to the heart or something ranger like. He isn't even the best swordsman in the books. While wearing no armor can make you more dexterous, it's a good point that Aragorn is at a disadvantage for never wearing any. If he wasn't so incredibly skilled to begin with, his journey after losing the hand wouldn't carry nearly as much weight as it does. Aragorn as an old man can probably man-handle peak Jamie. One thing to consider is that Lord of the Rings is based on and has the tech level equivalent of early middle ages, while A Song of Ice and Fire is based on and has the tech level equivalent of late middle ages. Thankfully for him, everyone else is just as shit in the movie. So what? What we do know of Aragorn is this -- he has battled orcs and goblins, Urak-hai and Ringwraiths, and has fought and led Men into numerous battles, both large and small, including the Battle of the Hornburg and the Battle of the Pelennor Fields. But yes, they do address that particular feat. He even goes on to say Smaug would defeat most of his dragons, despite being smaller than most of them once full grown, due to Smaug having human intelligence. While the actor portraying Aragorn in The Lord of the Ringsmovies appears as a normal man, Middle-earth lore makes it clear that the men ofNmenor are far stronger than the average human. Kingslayer (Jamie Lannister) vs Aragorn 86 results 1 2 #1 Edited By CapitolPunishment Lord Tywin Lannister believes its time for a change of 1st high King of the Reunited Kingdom. Doubtful as Mithril is pretty damn rare but as I said in my last post: in a 1v1 fight platemail is far inferior to chainmail as it was invented to stop high powered long rang weapons (crossbows, longbows etc..) thus sacrificing agility and speed. Aragorn has Numenor blood, which gives him incredible power. His incredible skill with a sword is quite instrumental to his character. Besides, I think Tolkien can be quite hyperbolic with things like that; his, strength of character, etc, was above that of most men, I think that was more. How about the fact that the only kind of armor mentioned in LOTR is chain mail, while ASoIaF consistently shows knights wearing full plate? Let's just say that he's renowned as the best swordsman there is. Meanwhile, one precise strike at Aragorn's vitals could be all it takes to win. "The things I do for love. You ignoring that the material strength of armor is a factor in it's effectiveness and me pointing out that you have no reference as to which is stronger is nitpicking? Le grand Aragorn ne peut pas perdre contre un pseudo chevalier incestueux. His skills have likely declined while Aragorn is still stronger than ever at 80 due to his bloodline and the constant and endless battles against far superior foes. Ser Selmy at one point talks of Jaime being the best natural swordsman that he's ever seen. I call it being logical. Boromir would be a better match, and even then stomps Jaime Lannister. Aragorn often fought against superior numbers, big deal. But this is tangential. Of all the popular match-ups in the fantasy world, The Lord of the Rings' Aragorn facingGame of Thrones'Jaime Lannister is among the most talked about. - Battle to KO, surrender or Death. To the death!!! [Spoiler Alert] Aragorn wins when they fight in Book J. That is all. His incredible skill with a sword is quite instrumental to his character. The very fact that AOSIAF has plate armor indicates greater level of metallurgy than LOTR. Nothing else really needs to be said. I'm not going to argue this, because -- as I said -- I don't even necessarily agree with it myself. Stealth is only useful if the enemy hasn't seen you yet. Although royal blood can hold power in Game of Thrones, nothing about Jaime's body is different from any other person. As for Anduril's qualities, what you just listed is better than anything Jamie ever did with any specific sword, so again, any equipment advantage mentioned in books goes to Aragorn's sword, not Jamie's armor. Yea I read them it wouldnt even be a fight. edit: debuffsz tek att :) jaime lannister'in dizide kl ustaln ok grmedik ama kitaplarnda felaket iyi bir sava diye bahsediliyordu. And she wins a tournament -- one which is lacking some of the true Westeros powerhouses (save for the Knight of Flowers, who else attended Renly's tournament?). yine de aragorn ile kyaslanamaz. Something else to consider. Imagine Aragorn vs. a single goblin, or a single orc, or a single Urak-hai. You disregarding that Andril came from elven forged steel and was born from the blade that severed the fingers off Sauron's hand while Lannister has nothing noteworthy for a weapon other than a well made sword is nitpicking? He has excellent endurance and stamina, true, but that's only going to help him if he can stand up to Jaime's skill with a blade. Actually, he's been up front about his characters chances if paired against LOTR characters. Jaime is a foe who has extensively studied the blade and is said by many characters to be extremely skilled. Selmy and Dayne are even greater. Actualiser. You are using an out of date browser. He's long lived, so what, that has no practical application in a duel. My vote goes to him simply because his physical stats are higher (due to him running for 3 days straight) and he used to train with Legolas. Winner: Aragorn Jaime's skill paired with his armor means he could stand his ground for a long while and take a good amount of hits before going down. You are using an out of date browser. Sorry Jaime, you'd give him a good fight, but you'd loose. Aragon is proficient, Jaime is the best of its time. It would be a good bit closer. I won't go too far into details (AoOB and all that), but the claim was that Aragorn's merely insanely skilled and experienced, with his only superhuman attribute being his enhanced lifespan. At one point he is in a very weakened state with his hands bound and he fights another expert swordsman, later the person he was fighting admits they could barely hold there own against him. Winner: Aragorn Despite most match-up discussions favoring Aragorn by a landslide, it would likely be a much closer fight than people realize. The only instance I can recall of Anduril doing anything uber is cleaving an orc's helmet in half, which is impressive, but I don't think it's that impressive to give him any edge. Most of those foes aren't very impressive, there are just multiples of them. With such a disadvantage he was still more than a match for an excellent swordsman, imagine if he'd been in a heathly state at the time. it is purposedly done by Martin to make the loss of his sword hand in a later book such a crisis of character for the Kingslayer. Jaime's skill paired with his armor means he could stand his ground for a long while and take a good amount of hits before going down. It's hard to explain without spoiling things. And no, Jaime doesn't have anything approaching Aragorn's endurance feats. I mean boromir is supposed to be one of the greatest fighters in middle earth, atleast among mankind. He can fight all of the Nazgul at the same time and kill dozens of Uruk-hai, all of them bigger and stronger than any soldier Jaime ever killed. No it's not good enough for me because the materials going into the making of the armor are not taken into account. At one point he is in a very weakened state with his hands bound and he fights another expert swordsman, later the person he was fighting admits they could barely hold there own against him. Throughout his life, he hunted and attacked allies of Sauron and even led a siege on the city of Umbar, which stood with the forces of Mordor. At just 16 years old, Aragorn became a Ranger of the North, protecting the lands from dangerous foes. In the end, while Jaime is considered to be one of the great swordsmen in Westeros, Aragorn is considered to be the greatest Man in all of Middle-Earth. And Aragorn facing five Ringwraiths atop Weather top is also impressive, considering that they are most powerful servants of Sauron. I've got to go with Aragorn as well.unless your talking about the Kingslayer from the books.
New World Dynasty Mutation Drops, Make Photo Black And White Photoshop, Sunrisers Eastern Cape Owner, Simpson Power Washer Oil Type, C# Maskedtextbox Currency, Cloudfront Access Denied Path, Is Russia Self Sufficient In Energy, Michael Chandler Ranking, Air Force Heels Regulation, Carolingian Definition,
